@Gatekeeper, ja jeg formulerte meg ikke presist.
Det man må huske på, er at Torah (GT/bibelen) og Talmud (den muntlige bibel, som etterhvert også ble utgitt på skrift) tolkes slik RABBIENE mener de skal tolkes. Disse rabbiene (det står også i Talmud) sier at det kun er jødene som er mennesker. Goyim (gentiles) er skitne dyr, våre sjeler har tre sataniske komponenter osv.
Her er det helt essensielt og viktig å forstå, at denne rabbien Schneerson er Noahidelovenes “far”, det er denne vedkommende og hans lære som ligger i bunn for bestræbelsene med å innføre Noahidelovene som universell lov, som ALLE SKAL underkaste seg: Les f.eks også dette FN-dokumentet publisert på FN’s nettsider i 2016
Siterer siste paragraf i FN-dokumentet:
“The Institute of Noahide Code is a UN-accredited NGO dedicated to spreading awareness of the Seven Noahide Laws, which ALL PEOPLES ARE OBLIGATED TO FOLLOW. It takes its guidance from the inspiring vision of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, who understood the inherent power of these laws to unite the nations of the world.”
Så til Alison Weirs artikkel som hjelper en i gang med å forstå hvordan de tenker:
Sitat fra artikkelen (jeg uthever noe av det viktige med bold skrift):
Non-Jewish souls ‘satanic’
While Chabad sometimes openly teaches that “the soul of the Jew is different than the soul of the non-Jew,” Schneerson’s specific teachings on this subject are largely unknown.
Quite likely very few Americans, both Jews and non-Jews, are aware of Schneerson’s teachings about the alleged deep differences between them – and about how these teachings are applied in the West Bank and Gaza.
Let us look at Schneerson’s words, as quoted by two respected Jewish professors, Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky, in their book Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel (text available online here). This book, praised by Noam Chomsky, Edward Said, and many others is essential reading for anyone who truly wishes to understand modern day Israel-Palestine. (Brackets in the quotes below are in the translations by Shahak and Mezvinsky.)
Some of Schneerson’s rarely reported teachings:
“The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: ‘Let us differentiate.’ Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of ‘let us differentiate’ between totally different species.”
“This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world … The difference in the inner quality between Jews and non-Jews is so great that the bodies should be considered as completely different species.”
“An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness.”
“As has been explained, an embryo is called a human being, because it has both body and soul. Thus, the difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish embryo can be understood.”
“…the general difference between Jews and non-Jews: A Jew was not created as a means for some [other] purpose; he himself is the purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to serve the Jews.”
“The important things are the Jews, because they do not exist for any [other] aim; they themselves are [the divine] aim.”
“The entire creation [of a non-Jew] exists only for the sake of the Jews.”
Most people don’t know about this aspect of Schneerson’s teaching because, according to Shahak and Mezvinsky, such teachings are intentionally minimized, mistranslated, or hidden entirely.
For example, the quotes above were translated by the authors from a book of Schneerson’s recorded messages to followers that was published in Israel in 1965. Despite Schneerson’s global importance and the fact that his world headquarters is in the U.S., there has never been an English translation of this volume.
Shahak, an Israeli professor who was a survivor of the Nazi holocaust, writes that this lack of translation of an important work is not unusual, explaining that much critical information about Israel and some forms of Judaism is available only in Hebrew.
He and co-author Mezvinsky, who was a Connecticut Distinguished University Professor who taught at Central Connecticut State University, write, “The great majority of the books on Judaism and Israel, published in English especially, falsify their subject matter.”
According to Shahak and Mezvinsky, “Almost every moderately sophisticated Israeli Jew knows the facts about Israeli Jewish society that are described in this book. These facts, however, are unknown to most interested Jews and non-Jews outside Israel who do not know Hebrew and thus cannot read most of what Israeli Jews write about themselves in Hebrew.”
In Shahak’s earlier book, Jewish History, Jewish Religion , he provides a number of examples. In one, he describes a 1962 book published in Israel in a bilingual edition. The Hebrew text was on one page, with the English translation on the facing page.
Shahak describes one set of facing pages in which the Hebrew text of a major Jewish code of laws contained a command to exterminate Jewish infidels: “It is a duty to exterminate them with one’s own hands.” The English version on the facing page softened it to “It is a duty to take active measures to destroy them.’”
The Hebrew page then went on to name which “infidels” must be exterminated, adding “may the name of the wicked rot.” Among them was Jesus of Nazareth. The facing page with the English translation failed to tell any of this.
“Even more significant,” Shahak reports, “in spite of the wide circulation of this book among scholars in the English-speaking countries, not one of them has, as far as I know, protested against this glaring deception.”
Ovenstående sitat er bare en brøkdel av materiale som dokumenterer at i jødenes øyne er det kun dem som er mennesker, vi goyim/gentiles er så lavtstående at vi knapt kan regnes som mennesker, vi er dyr, og skal være jødenes slaver.
Her en video med en god innledning, den viser at selv den “vanlige jøde” i Israel går rundt med oppfattelsen at goyim skal være jødenes slaver:
Så da kan vi bedre forstå bakgrunnen for at jøder og goyims skal dømmes forskjellig, og underlegges to forskjellige tolkninger/rettssystemer.
@Gatekeeper Det er altså riktig som du sier, at bibelen forbyr å bruke bare ett vitnes utsagn, men dette gjelder kun for jødene.
Noahidelovene er kun for goyims (gentiles), og goyims (gentiles) er - som overfor demonstrert - ikke mennesker, vi er laverestående vesener med sataniske sjelskomponenter og helt annen type DNA enn jødene (hevder dem). Derfor kan en goyim (gentile) dømmes ved hjelp av kun én dommmer, og basert på kun ett vitne.